Re: Gigabyte Latest BIOS
No problem LSD, Thank you!
For your info, I just tried the latest official F5 Bios and I cannot resume from S3.
This was at settings in sig (195x20/21), except for higher vcore since I imagine F5 has no TDP limit. I have to do the same thing when I switch from my 24/7 settings on F3 (with TDP lim), to my Bench settings on F4j/m (No TDP lim).
Only other thing I might be doing differently is Sata Mode. I'm using AHCI...
Also, I noticed most newer BIOS's do not automatically set proper uncore ratio of 2x ram multi...
F3---> Ram 2:8, uncore on auto =x16 (3120)
F5---> Ram 2:8, uncore on auto =x19 or x20 (3705-3900) (don't remember exactly)
With an 940 or 965 it might be ok, but with the necessary high bclk to OC the 920, those ratios push the uncore too far when left on auto...
I'm thinking maybe something else that we cannot see/set is being pushed too much with the newer BIOS's?
Regards,
Ced
Originally posted by Lsdmeasap
View Post
No problem LSD, Thank you!
For your info, I just tried the latest official F5 Bios and I cannot resume from S3.
This was at settings in sig (195x20/21), except for higher vcore since I imagine F5 has no TDP limit. I have to do the same thing when I switch from my 24/7 settings on F3 (with TDP lim), to my Bench settings on F4j/m (No TDP lim).
Only other thing I might be doing differently is Sata Mode. I'm using AHCI...
Also, I noticed most newer BIOS's do not automatically set proper uncore ratio of 2x ram multi...
F3---> Ram 2:8, uncore on auto =x16 (3120)
F5---> Ram 2:8, uncore on auto =x19 or x20 (3705-3900) (don't remember exactly)
With an 940 or 965 it might be ok, but with the necessary high bclk to OC the 920, those ratios push the uncore too far when left on auto...
I'm thinking maybe something else that we cannot see/set is being pushed too much with the newer BIOS's?
Regards,
Ced
Comment