Its entirely possible that that 300W PSU is holding ya back but so long as you stay under 1.7v on the core you'll be fine.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
overeclocking one of the fastest PC ever
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by First EngineerDear way out ..
well what you have mentioned is theoratically right but as you know there is a practical limitation actually as i told you i exchanged my 3.06 to 3.2 800 fsb but the suprise is that there is a very slight differince in performance due to DR.Hardware 2004 ..!!
The 2.4C does outperform a 3.06B, they're both HT enabled, but the 2.4 is on a 200mhz QDR bus, whilst the 3.06 is only on a 133 QDR bus. Than the 2.4C at 3.4Ghz just all out murders a 3.06 as its at a 283 QDR bus.
Comment
-
In a situation like yours, 300w psu especially if it's a cheap one is askin for trouble. If I am not mistaken, I believe the 800fsb ht p4's use about 10 watts more than a 533fsb ht p4 and 25 watts more than a 533fsb non ht p4(at stock speeds). In general, ocing can become difficult without enough power.athlon xp-m@2456mhz(12x204)
tt aquariusII liquid cooled/ arctic silver ceramique
asus a7n8xe-dlx
thermaltake xaserIII lanfire
bfg 6800gt
seagate sataII 250gb/seagate 7200rpm 160gb ide
samsung dvdrw
2x1024 kingston hyper-x pc3200/ windows xp pro sp3
logitech mx518/ logitech wingman rumble
2x samsung 955df 19"/ canon i960
creative x-fi fatal1ty 64mb/ altec lansing 251-5.1
mushkin 550w
opteron 146 @ 2850 (10x285)
DFI infinity nf4 ultra
thermaltake tsunami dream -black
seagate sataII 500gb
evga 8600gt oc ssc edition
samsung sata dvd-rw
2x1024 ocz black
logitech ifeel/ nec accusync 75f
ocz fatal1ty 550w
Comment
-
Originally posted by maximus7001In a situation like yours, 300w psu especially if it's a cheap one is askin for trouble. If I am not mistaken, I believe the 800fsb ht p4's use about 10 watts more than a 533fsb ht p4 and 25 watts more than a 533fsb non ht p4(at stock speeds). In general, ocing can become difficult without enough power.
Get at least a 430W Antec...
Comment
-
Originally posted by amd_man2003Originally posted by First EngineerDear way out ..
well what you have mentioned is theoratically right but as you know there is a practical limitation actually as i told you i exchanged my 3.06 to 3.2 800 fsb but the suprise is that there is a very slight differince in performance due to DR.Hardware 2004 ..!!
The 2.4C does outperform a 3.06B, they're both HT enabled, but the 2.4 is on a 200mhz QDR bus, whilst the 3.06 is only on a 133 QDR bus. Than the 2.4C at 3.4Ghz just all out murders a 3.06 as its at a 283 QDR bus.
Comment
Comment