3DMark03 scores

[Julio]

here's another score
all default settings
no overclocking
Cat 3.1 drivers
all default driver settings using appl. preferences
Win 2K pro serv. pk 3
abit kr7a mb
xp 2100+

[mrfin]

Finally got the program to run. Here's my score - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=353258

[james mcnamara]

good score thought dx9 deed not work with nvida cards

[0R1()N]

I n0t1c3d th@t th3 sc0r3s d1ff3r gr3@t3ly fr0m 2001 @nd 2003 3dm@12k why 1s th1s?

[The__tweaker]

Well of course they do, our hardware is a bit behind this software. When 2001 came not many could score above this numbers either. You need a dx9 videocard in order to run all 3 tests, myself and many others here doesn't have one so that is the reason our results suck like grass roots.. :thumbs do

And for christs sake try to type proper so a fellow can read now will ya..? :no:

:cheers:

[james mcnamara]

bad typing, doesn't have one

[weta]

When posting your scores, could you all mention which motherboard, memory, processor, and
graphics card you are using, this information could prove very helpful to other members when they consider upgrading in the future.

[revenant]

I n0t1c3d th@t th3 sc0r3s d1ff3r gr3@t3ly fr0m 2001 @nd 2003 3dm@12k why 1s th1s?

or1()n, u r t00 l337, d00d. =]



:cool:

[serval]

I got 1200 with a:
athlon 2400+ (@2205 mhz)
Radeon 8500 LE (290/274)
1 gig crucial pc2100
newest omega drivers (as of early march)

The cpu cost $100 and the radeon was $50 (yeah www.craigslist.org !) Can anyone beat that buget/score? Well, probably


:cheers:

Smithers

[NauticamaN]

ok i did the 3dmark03 on my computer and i got 2609 at first then i went to the website chat and they laughed at me cuz it was "Bad" heck i dunno anything about this stuff so i took that as bad but some guy gave me a driver website and i downloaded a catylist 3.1 and 3.2 but the 3.2 messed up my computer but anyways after installing the 3.1 i got a good jump from 2609 to 3901 and i dunno if thats good, this is what my computer is

p4 2.4bghz
2x512 pc2700 kingston ram non ecc
soyo sy-p4x400 dragon lite board
120 western digital 7500 rpm
radeon 9500 pro
windows xp pro
direct x 9.0 (needed for 3dmark03 to get good score)

so is that good???? i was told i could push 6k with the new drivers but i dunno but i guess i'll try again and post my score to you guys tomorrow night cuz its late and i need to get to bed cuz its 4 am

[revenant]

I'd say that is right for your setup... You may be able to squeeze a few more points out of your card with the R350 driver mod. Check this tread for details.

http://forums.tweaktown.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9552

:cheers:

[weta]

X-bit has tested the following graphics cards using Futuremark's 3DMark03 benchmark program.

Testbed

Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz CPU
ASUS P4S8X (SiS648) mainboard
512MB DDR333 SDRAM
IBM DTLA 15GB, 7200rpm HDD
Windows XP Professional SP1

Cards tested

ATi Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB
ATi Radeon 9500 Pro 128MB
ATi Radeon 9500 128MB
ATi Radeon 9500 64MB
ATi Radeon 9100 128MB
ATi Radeon 9000 128MB
Nvidia GeforceFX 5800 Ultra 128MB
Nvidia Geforce4 Ti4800 128MB
Nvidia Geforce4 Ti4600 128MB
Nvidia Geforce4 Ti4200-8x 128MB
Nvidia Geforce4 MX440-8x 64MB
Nvidia Geforce3 Ti200 128MB
SiS Xabre 600 64MB

Drivers used

ATi Catalyst 3.2 (.622)
Nvidia Detonator 42.86
Nvidia Detonator 42.68
SiS Xminator 3.10.51
SiS AGP Driver 1.14

Read their article here >>

[colmaca]

:cheers:

Intel Celeron 1.2 GHz

Arrrrrrr it won't put my score pic here it was 2262

http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=126485

<img src="http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachm...=&postid=126485">

DirectX Info
Version 9.0



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Description RADEON 9700
Manufacturer ATI Technologies Inc.
Total Local Video Memory 256 MB
Total Local Texture Memory 256 MB

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:cheers: get some new **** next week http://www.giga-byte.com/products/8inxp.htm and a p4 3.06 to go with it it may up my score a Weeeeeeee bit ,(i hope it will

[MarlonB]

I don't get it :(

My score is a whooping 230 :steam:

Xp-prof
Mainboard: ASUS A7V333
cpu : athlon xp 2000+
Mem : 1GB pc2700 333Mhz
Videocard : Asus Geforce4 MX 440
Directx : 9
Latest nvidia en via drivers.

[revenant]

Well, in your case, your video card is the limiting factor for your machine's "gaming performance" in a DX9 environment. Geforce cards lesser than the new FX series typically do not do well on 3Dmark03, well, or should I say that, actually, 3Dmark03 is not tailored for cards which do not support DX9 in hardware. The GF4 MX series are significantly less powerfull than the GF4 "ti" series cards, and those are significantly less powerfull than the Radeon 9700 Pro series cards. When I had my XP2100 CPU and GF4 ti4200 I was getting about 1500 on 3Dmark03. When got my 9700 Pro, my score jumped up to 4500+! So, you can see the difference having a card which supports DX9 in hardware makes for this test. Now I get 5400+ plus on that test; that's with an XP 2600+ CPU (OC'd to past XP3000 speeds), nForce2 mobo with dual channel DDR mem, and a 9700 Pro.

I think a more fair test of your machine's abilities would be 3Dmark2001SE. Maybe give that one a go and see what you get.
:cheers: