same old question

[tix]

OK simple question for you guys :
Witch is the faster/better card

Geforce 4 Titanium 4200 with 64 MB or

Geforce FX 5200 with 128 MB

???????????????????????????????

[Soulburner]

Geforce 4 Titanium 4200 with 64 MB

Easy.

But why 64mb? How cheap is it?

The 128mb cards are under $100...

[tix]

I have them both allready !
I wonder witch one to use for my game machine ???

[SearanoX]

Use the Ti4200. While you won't get all of the (half-assed) DX9 features with it, games will generally run much better than on the FX. The lower-end FX cards aren't worth touching for anything aside from desktop work and Counter-Strike.

*curses nVidia and their partner companies for releasing such cheap video cards and advertising them as "blazing fast"*

[Beefy]

And if you're playing CS and using a low-end FX, then you deserve to suffer...

[maximus7001]

I wonder witch one to use for my game machine ???

Well, isnt it obvious?

[zeradul]

[b]*curses nVidia and their partner companies for releasing such cheap video cards and advertising them as "blazing fast"*

Remember, they ARE fast for anything but games....

[SmokeyTheBalrog]

*curses nVidia and their partner companies for releasing such cheap video cards and advertising them as "blazing fast"*

Well... they *ARE* blazing fast....
they can even keep up with high end cards...

as long as you account for air resistance they should travel at about the same speed.

[Black Rain]

Well... the *ARE* blazing fast....
they can even keep up with high end cards...

as long as you account for air resistance they should travel at about the same speed.

Sorry man, the FX5200's are better in that case as they have small passive heatsinks, compared to the big boys larger, active ones. Considering the strength the average geek has in the arm, less weight = higher volicity.

[Yawgm0th]

And if you're playing CS and using a low-end FX, then you deserve to suffer...

Excuse me?:no: :grr:

I wouldn't have to suffer if low-end graphics weren't all I have. Maybe if I had a new PC or something *cough*

[SmokeyTheBalrog]

Sorry man, the FX5200's are better in that case as they have small passive heatsinks, compared to the big boys larger, active ones. Considering the strength the average geek has in the arm, less weight = higher volicity.

Actually, I would have to say that it is situational as to which would be the faster card. If you are on a relatively fast surface and going for a lateral throw then yes a lighter card would definitely help depending on arm strength.

However, if you go on top of a tall building and go for a downwards through then a heavier card would help you overcome air resistance. Even if you start out slower because of the whole arm, strength, weight issue.

And if you're playing CS and using a low-end FX, then you deserve to suffer...

*Whacks Beefy upside the head with low-end integrated graphics card*
(since it's integrated into my whole laptop it probably hurts quite a bit)

Excuse me?:no: :grr:

[Yawgm0th]

I figured he was joking, you didn't need to hit him with your laptop! Now, with that concussion he must have, he won't be able to provide advice for me (and others I suppose) with my new computer. *coughs at Beefy some more*

Just be happy you don't have an integrated 64 MB intel card.
:shoot3: Intel Card:hammer: :shoot2:

[minibubba]

PS: is Soulburner really banned, or like is it like somekind of like joke like like

:rolleyes: why does this keep coming up? yes he's banned, if you must know more, read [this]

as for the rest of this thread, just remember that 'drugs are bad' :hammer:

[Yawgm0th]

This coming from an admitted addict occording to his own description. : peace:

[minibubba]

so that means i know what I'm talking about :p

now just what are you talking about anyway? :confused: