Tweet
Sorry,
That last post has incorrect scores. The benchmark scores with AA/AF are suppose to be switched.
3Dmark Results
1024*768 NO AA/AF
Number 1: 5920
Number 2: 6093
1024*768 4AA/8AF
Number 1: 2763
Number 2: 2834
1024*768 NO AA/AF
Aquamark3
Number 1: 41.5 FPS
Number 2: 44.2 FPS
1024*768 3AA/8AF
Aquamark3
Number 1: 31.3 FPS
Number 2: 32.1 FPS
These are correct. The older scores show that ATI had the upperhand, but these are correct Nvidia wins the throne.
All Drivers and BIOS are the lastest. XP Pro all updated.
After some research the 9800XT does seem to have better scores, but very very close scores. Nvidia still beats ATI in some parts of the tests, but ATI's XT wins the overall by a small fraction. Still these differences are not noticable when it comes down to it. I think I will stick with Nvidia because they are cheaper and perform just as well.
I wonder if Nvidia has anything up their sleeves. They can't stand being second.
That last post has incorrect scores. The benchmark scores with AA/AF are suppose to be switched.
3Dmark Results
1024*768 NO AA/AF
Number 1: 5920
Number 2: 6093
1024*768 4AA/8AF
Number 1: 2763
Number 2: 2834
1024*768 NO AA/AF
Aquamark3
Number 1: 41.5 FPS
Number 2: 44.2 FPS
1024*768 3AA/8AF
Aquamark3
Number 1: 31.3 FPS
Number 2: 32.1 FPS
These are correct. The older scores show that ATI had the upperhand, but these are correct Nvidia wins the throne.
All Drivers and BIOS are the lastest. XP Pro all updated.
After some research the 9800XT does seem to have better scores, but very very close scores. Nvidia still beats ATI in some parts of the tests, but ATI's XT wins the overall by a small fraction. Still these differences are not noticable when it comes down to it. I think I will stick with Nvidia because they are cheaper and perform just as well.
I wonder if Nvidia has anything up their sleeves. They can't stand being second.
Comment