Re: Hard Drives and opinions and suggestions.
Well, more or less the source is similar, but the data is more trustworthy b/c it is not based on user opinion. It is based on real failed products:
Well, more or less the source is similar, but the data is more trustworthy b/c it is not based on user opinion. It is based on real failed products:
The first question we must answer is of course behind these statistics. They come from a large e-retailer French, with whom we have direct access to databases. We were therefore able to extract directly the statistics we needed. Of course, they are limited to products sold through this e-shopping, and customer returns made directly from the merchant, which is not always the case since it is possible to return directly from the manufacturer : however, this represents a minority in the first year. Unfortunately there is no other means of reliable statistics. Who would believe such failure rates given directly by the manufacturer of a product?
The failure rate reported is that the pieces sold between 1 April 2010 and 1 October 2010, for returns created before April 2011, six months to 1 year of operation. The statistics are based on mark by a minimum sample of 500 sales, those models with a minimum sample of 100 sales.
The failure rate reported is that the pieces sold between 1 April 2010 and 1 October 2010, for returns created before April 2011, six months to 1 year of operation. The statistics are based on mark by a minimum sample of 500 sales, those models with a minimum sample of 100 sales.
Comment