This is a an educational question by it's nature.
I ask this because I see many people pushing their FSB up while compromising CPU speed.
There are several reasons I can understand for doing so:
a. The CPU cannot overclock above certain speed.
b. The CPU cooling is exhusted, or you just want lower CPU temperatures.
c. You want to run at highest FSB possible.
For the first two reason you would (possibly) get higher memory bandwidth and lower latencies which some application would benefit from. The third, while not being rational, is still acceptable.
But does it make sence to have a lower seepd and higher FSB for practical reasons?
If you have a CPU that is capable of doing 4.5GHz with 450FSB is there any practical reason to run it at 4.25GHz with 500FSB, other than those mentioned above?
Would benchmarks (ther than memory benchmarks) show any gain, and what benchmarks if there are?
I ask this because I see many people pushing their FSB up while compromising CPU speed.
There are several reasons I can understand for doing so:
a. The CPU cannot overclock above certain speed.
b. The CPU cooling is exhusted, or you just want lower CPU temperatures.
c. You want to run at highest FSB possible.
For the first two reason you would (possibly) get higher memory bandwidth and lower latencies which some application would benefit from. The third, while not being rational, is still acceptable.
But does it make sence to have a lower seepd and higher FSB for practical reasons?
If you have a CPU that is capable of doing 4.5GHz with 450FSB is there any practical reason to run it at 4.25GHz with 500FSB, other than those mentioned above?
Would benchmarks (ther than memory benchmarks) show any gain, and what benchmarks if there are?
Comment