If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I would like to know if someone can tell me what is wrong with my score or is this normal? The thing is I have seen ppl with 9600xt's that get a better score on 2005 but I get better scores at almost every other bench(and more fps then the ati9600xt in games). I know a few other ppl with the same card but have the same low scores, is something else the matter?
I would like to know if someone can tell me what is wrong with my score or is this normal? The thing is I have seen ppl with 9600xt's that get a better score on 2005 but I get better scores at almost every other bench(and more fps then the ati9600xt in games). I know a few other ppl with the same card but have the same low scores, is something else the matter?
The XT in the ATi line means that its the top of that model range where as in the nVIDIA line XT means the bottom of the heap model (XT in nVIDIA means the same as SE in ATi, both are crippled and don't perform near as well as the "plain Jane" versions of those same models).
The XT in the ATi line means that its the top of that model range where as in the nVIDIA line XT means the bottom of the heap model (XT in nVIDIA means the same as SE in ATi, both are crippled and don't perform near as well as the "plain Jane" versions of those same models).
This I know but how do you explain why my card still performs better?
CS:source
My card has a 256-bit mem interface, while the ati is only 128-bit.
FX5900xt has 4x2 pipelines, 9600xt 4x1 pipeline
I can clearly see the difference in CS:source(steam one) where I get 146,9 fps average on the video test while the 9600xt gets 91.3 average fps.
The rig for the ati is: Amd 64 3000+ @ 2ghz ,512 jetram 3.2.2.6
Score 1880
Gigabyte 9600xt stock
The scores for 3dmark2003 is :
My card 9600xt
6330 4125
Does 2005 give a score on the quality of your picture/shaders? I know that the FX series have bad shader quality, maybe that is the problem?
GIgabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
AMD FX8120 @ 4GHz
Patriot 1866MHz EL series 2X4GB DDR3
Powercolour HD 6970 2GB w/XFX 8800GT 512MB Hybrid PhysX
Creative X-FI titanium HD w/Technics class A 300W amp and tower speakers
PC P&C 500W PSU
2TB Seagate
Coolermaster 690II w/Corsair H100 tucked under the hood
AMD ATHLON 64 3500+ VENICE SOC 939 w/ STOCK HEATSINK & FAN
ASUS A8N-SLI DELUXE (BIOS 1013)
BFG 7800 GT OC 256MB PCI-EXPRESS (nvidia driver version 77.77)
OCZ 1GB DUAL CHANNEL PC 3200 PLATINUM EDITION (OCZ4001024ELDCPE-K) TIMINGS: 2-3-2-5
2 x WESTERN DIGITAL 160GB SATA 2/300 8MB 7200RPM
LG GSA-4163B 16X DVD-RW
THERMALTAKE TSUNAMI CASE w/ SIDE WINDOW PANEL & 2 x 120mm FANS & 1 x 90mm FAN
OCZ MODSTREAM 520W PSU
WINDOWS XP PRO SERVICE PACK 2
DIRECT X 9.0C
Comment