Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

amd vs intel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • amd vs intel

    which is better intel or amd?

  • #2
    Re: amd vs intel

    intel is faster, but also cost the same as a small car
    My advice - never visit a short-url, no matter who gives it to you. You can't trust any source at any time when you don't know your target
    Whitey:Snuggles: Zotac Zbox HD-ID40 (Atom d525, worst purchase ever on cpu), Patriot Pyro 60GB (Thanks to Tweaktown Giveaway), 4GB 800' DDR2 SO-DIMM
    Bcube (NAS): ASUS F1A75-I Deluxe, AMD A6-3500 @ 2.1GHz, LSI 9240-8i (M1015) controller, GSkill Ares 1866 8GB blue kit, 4x Seagate SV35.5 2TB, 1x Seagate Barracuda 1.5TB, 1x Samsung HD103UJ, 1x Samsung F4 2TB, Temp. Rebel9 Alu case, Corsair H60, 2x Icy Dock MB973SP-B, NZXT UI01, Enermax T.B. Silence on docks and cpu, Aurum 500W gold PSU. (Draws 65W average, doesn't peak above 100W at any time)

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: amd vs intel

      once all the FUD is cleared up about Bulldozer we'll know then, one reason intel can be faster it this: Agner`s CPU blog - Intel's "cripple AMD" function
      AMD720BE unlocked to 3.2g, GB 770t-ud3p,mushkin silverline 8g,
      Cooler Master HAF-X,V6GT,800wGold ps,

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: amd vs intel

        i got ma own theory on it!.............
        if using with graphic card then INTEL..........coz intel lacks at graphics.......!
        and using w/o graphics card then AMD.........less cpu preformance then intel but with better graphics then INTEL

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: amd vs intel

          Originally posted by Sushil Sahu View Post
          i got ma own theory on it!.............
          if using with graphic card then INTEL..........coz intel lacks at graphics.......!
          and using w/o graphics card then AMD.........less cpu preformance then intel but with better graphics then INTEL
          The only decent onboard or on-CPU graphics so far are Intel's latest (HD 2000, HD 3000, HD 2500, HD 4000) and of those, only HD 4000 (i5 3570K, i7 3770K) is capable of actually playing any modern games. AMD's Trinity APU could be a step in the right direction (when it comes out). But for anything beyond watching HD video, I'd use a dedicated GPU anyway. As far as I know, none of AMD's past or present integrated graphics solutions are viable for gaming.

          Comment

          Working...
          X