Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

    i5-650 is 3.20 ghs dual core.
    i5-750 is 2.66 ghz quad core.

    Why didn't they make the i5-750 a 3.20 quad core. Am I missing something? Are they the same speed? Why would someone buy one or the other?

  • #2
    Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

    it is Intel marketing. Knowing that people look at a number, and figure a bigger number must be better, the two parts you are referring to are two different generations. The i5-650 is a Clarksdale dual core processor. The i5-750 however is a Lynnfield quad core part. The dual core part is a 32nanometer part and the quad core is a 45 nanometer part. Which is better for you really depends on what you use your computer for. Office applications, web surfing, email, movie watching and such are fine with a dual core part, so higher clock speed would be the better choice. If you use any program that can take advantage of two or more cores, such as Photoshop, then the quad core part, even at a lower clock speed might be better. It also depends on the operating system. Windows XP users should stick with the dual core part; Windows 7 users can use the quad core part. At this time, very few things take advantage of the extra cores. Extra cores allow a power user to keep a lot of applications open at the same time. That said, extra ram on a 64 bit OS is the better choice, irrespective of the processor being dual or quad core.
    List of Intel Core i5 microprocessors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

      yes, depend on apps that normally you used.
      most of the decent games supported multi-core,
      so if you look for gaming, get the i5-750
      i7 965 XE
      Gigabyte X58A-UD3R 1.0
      Team 2GB 1600 x 3
      CM 212+
      Asus EAH 4850/512
      WD black 1TB
      SB XFi Extreme
      XIGMATEK NRP-MC702 700W

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

        I just wrote a buyers guide (linked in my sig) that should help you out :)
        The post counter is not an intelligence meter!



        Heat Team IRONMODS

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

          i would say if you plan on gaming and keeping it a few years id go with the quad, if you just want to use it for a year and get a sandybridge system id go with the dual. For me i wanted headroom so i bought a i7 930, nice a fast today and next year.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

            get the quad for a better future proof...

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

              Definitely read miahallen's guide, it's rather good.

              IMO go for the Quad core, or even better if you can, consider a 1336 i7 system. I simply couldn't stretch to the extra cost so I stuck with a P55 and the 760.

              Remember, at stock the 750 will crank up the speed using turbo boost which will make single core usage at least, as good as anything else on the market.

              Games now are getting much more multi threaded and the hardware industry is also gearing up to adding more cores. From now on I believe that parallelism is going to be the future rather than raw clock speed. Many games such as Mafia II, Crysis (to a degree) and BBC-2 love quads. For example on my old E7400 at 3.9GHz with the same 460 I got ~38FPS average in the built in benchmark. Going to the i5 760 my FPS rocketed to ~66FPS average, which is actually a huge increase seeing as it was only the CPU and the RAM that changed.

              Again, IMO and only IMO, Hyper Threading isn't fantastic compared to having the two extra physical cores. In some cases HT can be great, but never as good as more real cores. In some situations, due to how HT works, it can have a negative performance effect. This is rare however and is usually when gaming or 3D modelling using specific tasks and computational patterns. It has to do with how the CPU uses spare resorces to execute another thread and how sometimes as a result, instructions get queued rather than being executed right away, introducing minor lag.

              I love my i5 Quad Core. It clocks really well, was easy to get "stable" and cost very little. It would actually have been more money to get myself a Q9550, which is bizzare!
              Coolermaster CM 690 II advance Case
              Corsair HX750 (CWT, 91%(80+ Gold rated @230V) single 62A 12V rail
              P55A-UD4 v2.0 @ F14
              Core i5 760 @ 20 x 201, 4.02GHz
              TRUE Black with a single Noctua NF-P12 pumping out 55 CFM @ 19db .
              2 x 2GB Mushkin Ridgeback (996902), @ 7-10-8-27, 2010-DDR, 1.66v
              2 x Gigabyte GTX 460 1024MB in SLI (Pre OC'd to 715MHz core and 1800MHz VRAM) @ 850 Core / 4100 Mem.
              Intel X25-M Boot Drive (OS and Programs) 200MB/s Read & 90MB/s Write
              Corsair X32 200MB/s Read & 100MB/s Write
              WD Caviar Blue 640GB C (Steam, Games, Storage, Temp Files & Folders, etc)
              Samsung F3 500GB Backup/Images
              Noctua 1300RPM 19dB case fan (rear extraction)
              3 x 140 MM Coolermaster LED fans (one front intake, one top extraction, one side intake)
              Dell Ultra Sharp 2209WAf E-IPS @ 1680x1050

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Which of the 2 processors are better - Intel i5-650 or Intel i5-750

                another difference: i5 650 has a video controller embedded. i5 750 hasn't.

                Comment

                Working...
                X