Originally posted by RDR
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Quadro FX vs. Geforce FX
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by SamuraiCatJBactually... for some reason, my software runs slower on any Wildcat than on nVidia. I am not deliberately programming for nVidia cards. Yet no other card has ever matched the nVidia line for us. We've tried ATI, Wildcat, FireGL, 3Dlabs and none have ever worked as good as our Geforce line starting at Quadro2Pros and continuing up through Quadro's and Geforce lines.... part of the problem for us is the variety, I think, many full sized textures, display lists, vertex arrays, bitmapped graphics, including logos and text, line drawing (in 3D space), etc. All in one.... it just seems to bog down everyone else (more than nVidia -- even nVidia I am only pulling 78-83fps on a Quadro4-900....
I haven't tried any ATi's for Prof Apps. lately - when we first started using gaming cards Ati couldn't match nVidia in openGL & I still think that's the case now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RDRthe only CAD stations we use Wildcats on are the one we use to generate (shaded) 3D surface files - IQ is key - the models usually aren't very complex - compared to the what we have on the eng/design boxes so speed isn't a problem...Wildcats are a lot slower than the Geforce series as far as frame rates go. - but you can see things in a shaded model that you just can't with a Geforce or even a Quadro
I haven't tried any ATi's for Prof Apps. lately - when we first started using gaming cards Ati couldn't match nVidia in openGL & I still think that's the case now.
Comment
Comment