Hey guys. Long time no see.
I have had 2x2GB OCZ Platinum CL5 1066 DDR2 RAMs for years and I used it @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15 timings without manual overvolting. It supposed to work at 2.3v at that settings according to the sticker on it but I can run it without setting it to 2.3v. IIRC it ran at 1.8 or 2.0v for most of the time.
Anyway I bought 2x2GB Kingston CL5 1066 RAMs (KHX8500D2K2/4G) a few months ago and I can't possibly use them together. The best I could do was to use 3 of them. When I use 4 sticks for most of the time I can't boot or I constantly get BSOD after 15 mins. I tried manually 2.2v and 2.3v with these (not sure how much I tried 2.3v as I am reluctant to go above 2.2v even tough all RAMs supposed to run at it) and it didn't help.
Right now I have only Kingston RAMs on my PC at 2.2v and I get BSODs very rarely and computer freezes from time to time.
As I got sick of working on them and I want to use my computer I don't try 3 or 4 sticks together anymore. Freezings seem to vary with no clear indication, be it on desktop or after playing a few hours of games.
At first when I bought these RAMs I thought they were faulty and thought that for a while because my OCZ RAMs never gave me problems. But some time ago I tested Kingston RAMs (at 800MHz) with Memtest86+ for 24 hours and it didn't show a single error. After thinking they're okay for a while I started to think if it could still be faulty and Memtest86+ didn't show it because I tested it at low settings? Last night I tested Kingston RAMs at 1066MHz @ 5-5-5-15 timings with 2.2v for 7 hours, still no single error.
While I should have a strong belief Kingston RAMs aren't faulty, I still feel somewhat doubtful and this gives me discomfort. As you can imagine they are used hardware and there is little I can do in case of a problem. Can you maybe comfort me by saying that they're perfectly okay? (lol)
Also, sometimes I get weird, low RAM utilization with Kingston RAMs, but I am never sure if those are really weird... but I don't remember having such feeling when using my OCZ RAMs. I was playing Metro: Last Light yesterday and the game was only using 150MB physical RAM while using about 800MB virtual RAM. I'm not sure if this is the norm for this game but it certainly feels weird. Is it possible that RAMs have faults and Windows tries to avoid it by not using too much RAM? This is one of the main reasons I still have doubts about these RAMs. I launched Ghost Recon: Future Soldier just to try, and it only used 500 MB of physical RAM. Then I tried one of the most demanding game installed on my PC, Medal of Honor: Warfighter, it used around 1 GB of physical RAM and I tried it for a few minutes then went on desktop to see what's going on and I couldn't return to the game but there were no freezing or crash. This can be hardware related or it can be just game acting weird. I'm not sure. But it's certainly suspicious. So what do you think about this weird situation?
I am willing to try setting combinations for 4 sticks 8 GB if you have some good idea but it will give me hard time using the computer (and may also delay detecting what I described above in case there's anything) so I'm more inclined to try Kingston RAMs alone and see if it's completely okay but it takes time to be sure (Which is the reason why this took so much time, along with my laziness).
Btw, my CPU is Q9400 running at 3.2GHz. But I have been using it overclocked for years, no any kind of issue there. And my GPU is MSI GTX 560Ti Hawk and my OS is Windows 8, in case you need to know.
Sorry for long post. Thanks for reading.
I have had 2x2GB OCZ Platinum CL5 1066 DDR2 RAMs for years and I used it @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15 timings without manual overvolting. It supposed to work at 2.3v at that settings according to the sticker on it but I can run it without setting it to 2.3v. IIRC it ran at 1.8 or 2.0v for most of the time.
Anyway I bought 2x2GB Kingston CL5 1066 RAMs (KHX8500D2K2/4G) a few months ago and I can't possibly use them together. The best I could do was to use 3 of them. When I use 4 sticks for most of the time I can't boot or I constantly get BSOD after 15 mins. I tried manually 2.2v and 2.3v with these (not sure how much I tried 2.3v as I am reluctant to go above 2.2v even tough all RAMs supposed to run at it) and it didn't help.
Right now I have only Kingston RAMs on my PC at 2.2v and I get BSODs very rarely and computer freezes from time to time.
As I got sick of working on them and I want to use my computer I don't try 3 or 4 sticks together anymore. Freezings seem to vary with no clear indication, be it on desktop or after playing a few hours of games.
At first when I bought these RAMs I thought they were faulty and thought that for a while because my OCZ RAMs never gave me problems. But some time ago I tested Kingston RAMs (at 800MHz) with Memtest86+ for 24 hours and it didn't show a single error. After thinking they're okay for a while I started to think if it could still be faulty and Memtest86+ didn't show it because I tested it at low settings? Last night I tested Kingston RAMs at 1066MHz @ 5-5-5-15 timings with 2.2v for 7 hours, still no single error.
While I should have a strong belief Kingston RAMs aren't faulty, I still feel somewhat doubtful and this gives me discomfort. As you can imagine they are used hardware and there is little I can do in case of a problem. Can you maybe comfort me by saying that they're perfectly okay? (lol)
Also, sometimes I get weird, low RAM utilization with Kingston RAMs, but I am never sure if those are really weird... but I don't remember having such feeling when using my OCZ RAMs. I was playing Metro: Last Light yesterday and the game was only using 150MB physical RAM while using about 800MB virtual RAM. I'm not sure if this is the norm for this game but it certainly feels weird. Is it possible that RAMs have faults and Windows tries to avoid it by not using too much RAM? This is one of the main reasons I still have doubts about these RAMs. I launched Ghost Recon: Future Soldier just to try, and it only used 500 MB of physical RAM. Then I tried one of the most demanding game installed on my PC, Medal of Honor: Warfighter, it used around 1 GB of physical RAM and I tried it for a few minutes then went on desktop to see what's going on and I couldn't return to the game but there were no freezing or crash. This can be hardware related or it can be just game acting weird. I'm not sure. But it's certainly suspicious. So what do you think about this weird situation?
I am willing to try setting combinations for 4 sticks 8 GB if you have some good idea but it will give me hard time using the computer (and may also delay detecting what I described above in case there's anything) so I'm more inclined to try Kingston RAMs alone and see if it's completely okay but it takes time to be sure (Which is the reason why this took so much time, along with my laziness).
Btw, my CPU is Q9400 running at 3.2GHz. But I have been using it overclocked for years, no any kind of issue there. And my GPU is MSI GTX 560Ti Hawk and my OS is Windows 8, in case you need to know.
Sorry for long post. Thanks for reading.
Comment