Re: A word of warning about f8b
NO, there is NOT 2 chips there is ONE. The Dual BIOS is virtual. The documentation is a right out lie. You can look at your board and see the ONE chip
DQ6 HAS 2 Chips though for sure, anything not DQ6 has one. And as you see that is a lie as well really, DQ6 is supposed to be quad, but it like the other has virtual. So 2 real, 2 virtual.
Show me on your board, there is only ONE chip. And also shown in the manual
P35-X (One chip, Dual Bios)
P35-DQ6 (2 Chips, Quad Bios)
*EDIT*
I do see what you mean on the boards though, it does have two chips there, but I think if it actually used them there would be FAR less RMA due to Bad BIOS.
I actually just seen there is 2 chips on my DS4, but I cannot switch to the other as you can in a DQ6 so I think it is disabled and not actually used AT ALL again otherwise there would be less need for RMA due to bad BIOS
But who know, and from what I have read from others, and Ga responses they do not want to directly answer this
Who knows, as there is also MANY DQ6 RMA's due to bad BIOS as well.
I think a better solution GA needs to implement 2 actual PLLC chips that can be replaced by the end user if need be. Ga would actually save money in the end by doing this instead of needing to RMA so many boards due to the solution they use now
NO, there is NOT 2 chips there is ONE. The Dual BIOS is virtual. The documentation is a right out lie. You can look at your board and see the ONE chip
DQ6 HAS 2 Chips though for sure, anything not DQ6 has one. And as you see that is a lie as well really, DQ6 is supposed to be quad, but it like the other has virtual. So 2 real, 2 virtual.
Show me on your board, there is only ONE chip. And also shown in the manual
P35-X (One chip, Dual Bios)
P35-DQ6 (2 Chips, Quad Bios)
*EDIT*
I do see what you mean on the boards though, it does have two chips there, but I think if it actually used them there would be FAR less RMA due to Bad BIOS.
I actually just seen there is 2 chips on my DS4, but I cannot switch to the other as you can in a DQ6 so I think it is disabled and not actually used AT ALL again otherwise there would be less need for RMA due to bad BIOS
But who know, and from what I have read from others, and Ga responses they do not want to directly answer this
Who knows, as there is also MANY DQ6 RMA's due to bad BIOS as well.
I think a better solution GA needs to implement 2 actual PLLC chips that can be replaced by the end user if need be. Ga would actually save money in the end by doing this instead of needing to RMA so many boards due to the solution they use now
Comment