Just want some opinions from experts or at least knowledgeable in HDD & benchmarks.
From the following screenshots, is the external Transcend StoreJet 1TB USB3.0 as fast as the Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB SATA2 (connected to SATA3 port; bought in 2008)? Or worse? Or a mixed bag?
I noticed both Transcend & WD's scores are mixed. Good or bad?
Sequential, random, 512K, 4K... Not sure what it all really means. All I know these are the software that are used to benchmark hard drives.
ATTO Disk Benchmark 2.47:
Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB SATA2 vs Transcend StoreJet 1TB USB3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1:
Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB SATA2 vs Transcend StoreJet 1TB USB3.0
From the following screenshots, is the external Transcend StoreJet 1TB USB3.0 as fast as the Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB SATA2 (connected to SATA3 port; bought in 2008)? Or worse? Or a mixed bag?
I noticed both Transcend & WD's scores are mixed. Good or bad?
Sequential, random, 512K, 4K... Not sure what it all really means. All I know these are the software that are used to benchmark hard drives.
ATTO Disk Benchmark 2.47:
Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB SATA2 vs Transcend StoreJet 1TB USB3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1:
Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB SATA2 vs Transcend StoreJet 1TB USB3.0