I got 6386 with my new Radeon 9500 pro with FSAA, 4X.
I got 6311 with the R9500Pro, no FSAA (notice it is less).
6 months ago, I got 6220 with a GF3Ti200, no FSAA and Oc'd a little.
I'm running the test at 1024 x 768/32bit
My system:
P4/1.7/423 socket
Intel 850GB mobo
1 gig PC800 RDRAM
Radeon 9500 Pro (new)
Audigy Platinum
2 x 40GB IBM deskstars/ATA100
WIN2K Pro
I got only 109 pts more with the 9500PRO than my GF3Ti200, does that seem right?
I got more points with FSAA on than FSAA off (with 9500PRO), does that seem right?
My computer has always been stable, everything says it is installed OK.
Am I running into score limitations due to my other hardware?
Any comments are appreciated, if it works, here is the link to my 3dM2001SE score.:
http://service.futuremark.com/servle...jectId=5838345 .
Thanks.
I got 6311 with the R9500Pro, no FSAA (notice it is less).
6 months ago, I got 6220 with a GF3Ti200, no FSAA and Oc'd a little.
I'm running the test at 1024 x 768/32bit
My system:
P4/1.7/423 socket
Intel 850GB mobo
1 gig PC800 RDRAM
Radeon 9500 Pro (new)
Audigy Platinum
2 x 40GB IBM deskstars/ATA100
WIN2K Pro
I got only 109 pts more with the 9500PRO than my GF3Ti200, does that seem right?
I got more points with FSAA on than FSAA off (with 9500PRO), does that seem right?
My computer has always been stable, everything says it is installed OK.
Am I running into score limitations due to my other hardware?
Any comments are appreciated, if it works, here is the link to my 3dM2001SE score.:
http://service.futuremark.com/servle...jectId=5838345 .
Thanks.
Comment