was just reading the review of the Xabre refrence card.
"Max Payne being based on DX8 technologies gives the Xabre a bit more of a advantage. Still unable to beat the nVidia in the core area, it does make up some ground, especially in FSAA"
now whats this about the xabre gaining back ground in the FSAA test??
it actualy looses more ground:
77/85 = .9 so its only 9 10ths of the performance of a gf4mx
20/26 = .76 so its less than 8 10ths of the performance of a gf4mx, and as were talking about 20 V's 26 FPS the difference is even more important than the 8 frames at full speed, they don't make any difference to playability, but 6 frames when your below 30 is the difference between being able to play for 1 minute and 5.
"Max Payne being based on DX8 technologies gives the Xabre a bit more of a advantage. Still unable to beat the nVidia in the core area, it does make up some ground, especially in FSAA"
now whats this about the xabre gaining back ground in the FSAA test??
it actualy looses more ground:
77/85 = .9 so its only 9 10ths of the performance of a gf4mx
20/26 = .76 so its less than 8 10ths of the performance of a gf4mx, and as were talking about 20 V's 26 FPS the difference is even more important than the 8 frames at full speed, they don't make any difference to playability, but 6 frames when your below 30 is the difference between being able to play for 1 minute and 5.
Comment