If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All latest beta bios are link for download in the OP. However I don't see your board listed in the list of Z68 boards so I'd bet you are limited to what Gigabyte has available for download on your boards product page. GL
hi
Merry Christmas all ok
Latest BIOS Xtreme! z87x-oc؟؟؟
thanks
Happy new year stasio ;) and yeah about the guys comment above :D any info on the latest X09 ??? z87oc bios ? if its based off the latest beta bios it will be fantastico as that bios is awesome :)
So is it safe/OK to use this BIOS if my X79-UP4 is rev. 1.0?
Thanks!
I need to know this too. I have the X79-UD3 rev. 1.0 and want to know officially if I can install the latest rev. 1.1 BIOS from the GIGABYTE Web site on my rev 1.0.
I need to know this too. I have the X79-UD3 rev. 1.0 and want to know officially if I can install the latest rev. 1.1 BIOS from the GIGABYTE Web site on my rev 1.0.
Yes.. BUT.. is Gigabyte not testing their own BIOS releases on Rev.1.0 boards anymore then ?
So not only all BIOSes are still full of bugs reported by customers but now the ones with a Rev.1.0 board don't have official support anymore too?
If that is the case then it's a real shame!
Gigabyte getting even worse than before.
So they released Rev.1.1 boards to tell all current Rev.1.0 customers that they just don't care anymore.. they got the money and that's it ?
If a customer with a Rev.1.0 board installs a new BIOS officially supported for Rev.1.1 only whatever it happens they don't care.. and maybe they would even tell that doing so would void warranty ?
What I have seen happening so far was that if there is a Rev. 2.0 mainboard of a model it would get BIOSses with a different naming convention. Gigabyte (a good example was the X58A-UD5 V1 and V2) named their Rev. 2 BIOSses FA, FA3, FB5 (F-Letter-number) and the Rev. 1 BIOSses were using our well known F-number-letter scheme.
I would assume if distinguishing between BIOS versions for board revisions is needed they change said conventions to avoid confusion, and as long as they don't, it simply doesn't matter.
Or putting it differently, if the differences were big enough to require a different BIOS they'd rather make it a 2.0 than a 1.1
Comment